Isnin, 8 Februari 2010

AMMB catat untung RM1.07 bilion

KUALA LUMPUR 8 Feb. - Keuntungan sebelum cukai AMMB Holdings Bhd. meningkat kepada RM1.07 bilion bagi tempoh sembilan bulan berakhir 31 Disember 2009, peningkatan 13.1 peratus berbanding RM944.280 juta sebelumnya.

Perolehan meningkat kepada RM4.905 bilion berbanding RM4.423 bilion sebelumnya, kata AMMB kenyataannya kepada Bursa Malaysia hari ini.

"Keuntungan kumpulan itu adalah hasil daripada perolehan yang meningkat 23.8 peratus dan pertumbuhan pinjaman bersih yang lebih baik berbanding jangkakan sebanyak 14.1 peratus tahun ke tahun, yang sebahagian besarnya hasil daripada pertumbuhan positif sambungan pinjaman kewangan dan pinjaman bersindiket," kata Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif Kumpulan dan Pengarah Urusannya, Cheah Tek Kuang.

Mengenai unjuran ekonomi dan industri, beliau berkata: "Apabila kami melihat 2010, kami mendapat rangsangan hasil daripada keyakinan dunia untuk melihat ekonomi global pulih.

"Bagaimanapun, berdasarkan pergantungan kepada perdagangan dan eksport, kami menjangkakan proses pemulihan di Malaysia akan berlaku secara beransur-ansur."

Sektor kewangan kekal stabil, mendapat manfaat menerusi dasar kewangan berhemat, rangsangan fiskal dan pemantauan yang lebih ketat oleh bank pusat.

Pertumbuhan dalam pinjaman dan aset berwajaran risiko bertambah baik hasil daripada perbelanjaan kerajaan, prospek pemulihan global serta penggunaan swasta yang lebih positif

IRIS, Heitech Padu bida projek bekal pasport pintar ke Nepal

NEW DELHI 8 Feb. - Dua syarikat Malaysia membida projek membekalkan pasport elektronik (MRP) untuk kerajaan Nepal yang perlu memodenkan operasi imigresen sebelum tarikh akhir 1 April depan.

IRIS Corporation Bhd. dan Heitech Padu Bhd. menyertai senarai pembida antarabangsa untuk membekalkan MRP ke Nepal yang memerlukan kira-kira satu juta pasport setahun.

"Kedua-dua syarikat itu sudah menyuarakan minat untuk membekalkan MRP ke Nepal dan sudah mengemukakan cadangan masing-masing. Nepal memerlukan kira-kira empat juta e-pasport (elektronik) dalam tempoh empat tahun akan datang," kata Duta Besar Malaysia ke Nepal, Datuk Ilankovan Kolandavelu.

Pihak berkuasa Imigresen Nepal perlu mematuhi tarikh akhir antarabangsa pada 1 April bagi memperkenal MRP memandangkan negara di dunia melaksanakan pasport elektronik untuk tujuan keselamatan serta memudahkan perjalanan.

Tujuh belas syarikat memasuki tender kerajaan Nepal yang kemudiannya dibatalkan. Kementerian Luar Negara menyebut proses tender itu dibatalkan kerana 'sebab-sebab teknikal'.

Kerajaan dijangka membelanjakan AS$70 juta (RM245 juta) untuk e-pasport itu.

Kedua-dua syarikat Malaysia yang terkenal di peringkat antarabangsa itu dan mempunyai kepakaran dalam mengeluarkan pasport elektronik, akan bersaing dengan India yang turut membida projek itu.

Syarikat India menawarkan cetakan MRP pada AS$4 (RM14) sekeping.

Iris dan rakan usaha samanya baru-baru ini memperoleh projek yang sama di Bangladesh bagi membekalkan MRP dan visa elektronik, satu kontrak bernilai hampir RM259.70 juta. - Bernama

Jumaat, 5 Februari 2010

Mokhzani Mahathir

Mokhzani Mahathir - the second son of former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad - has staged a comeback since he quit the corporate scene six years ago. He appears more focused now, as seen in the Raffles Conversation in The Business Times of Singapore today.

Back with a vengeance

Malaysian businessman Mokhzani Mahathir, written off after the 1998 Asian financial crisis, has made a spectacular comeback with the listing of his 46.7 per cent-owned firm Kencana Petroleum. S JAYASANKARAN reports

IN what has proved to be a well-timed return to the market, Malaysian businessman Mokhzani Mahathir floated his 46.7 per cent-owned firm Kencana Petroleum on the Kuala Lumpur stock exchange earlier this year, offering investors' shares at RM0.41 apiece. Given the boom in Malaysia's oil and gas industry, Kencana's shares soared and at current market valuations, Mr Mokhzani has emerged richer by at least RM236 million (S$102 million).

That's a triumphant comeback for a businessman who was all but written off after the 1998 Asian financial crisis. For Mr Mokhzani, however, his movement into oil and gas represents a back-to-roots event.

'By profession, I am a petroleum engineer anyway and I started my career with Shell,' he says. 'It was the first thing I did after I got back to Kuala Lumpur. It was also the first thing I did when I set out on my own.'

Then the businessman, the second son of former premier Mahathir Mohamad, got bitten by the Think-Big mentality that typified much of the Malaysian corporate sector in the 1990s.

In his words: 'Unfortunately, I got sidetracked and went into the other businesses which you know about and got into trouble. Tongkah, Pantai, I leveraged both the companies and me personally.'

In 2001, to stave off creditor banks and to blunt claims that his father's administration was practising nepotism (see sidebar), he had to sell the two companies, which had been involved in operations as diverse as healthcare and financial services.

'It was the same in both politics and business,' said Mr Mokhzani, who used to be assistant treasurer of the youth wing of the ruling United Malays National Organisation. 'I suppose the moral of the story is ... when you lose your way, go back to what you started from.

'We tried to settle all our debts but we couldn't. Nevertheless, the effort was made and it put us in good stead with some banks. Some of them wanted to maintain relationships with us, said they would be willing to help going forward. And the economy began turning and a few proposals had come to our table.'

One such proposal came from HL Engineering, a fabricator and petroleum services company. 'A lot of people make the mistake that it stands for Hong Leong,' says the businessman. 'But, no, it stands for Hin Loon after Chong Hin Loon, now the managing director of Kencana. We bought into it in late 2001 and we built it up and took it public this year.

The shares now trade at over RM2.50 apiece, which means the businessman is well and truly back. 'I have gone through the whole process of seeing shares fly and then crash,' he says, shrugging. Still, in Kencana's case at least, the shareholders have enjoyed seeing their shares going up.

A new shareholder is Quek Leng Chan, the tycoon behind the Hong Leong conglomerate, now reported to be among the top 10 shareholders. 'He is quite an aggressive investor,' says Mr Mokhzani. 'But I didn't know he was coming in. I only heard about it through a mutual friend, and I don't know what his strategy is.'

He intends to stick to Kencana. 'It is our main vehicle,' he says. 'We want it to be a brand name. I know there are others out there with the same name but they aren't related. For example, there is Kencana Property Management which recently bought Sungei Wang Plaza in Kuala Lumpur. We got calls over that but they are no relation.'

His point is that the company will stick to its core business. 'Kencana concentrates solely on oil and gas and nothing else,' he insists. 'And we intend to remain that way. It's not going to be an investment holding company like Tongkah and Pantai were. No more, this time we are going to be very focused and concentrate on just one thing at a time.'

He does have other interests but they are relatively insignificant. 'They are not under Kencana and they are small,' he says. 'I have the franchise for Porsche, an IT company in education software and some very small property development.'

Porsche? 'I've always loved high performance cars, which is why I am involved in motor-sports and the Sepang International Circuit ,' replies Mr Mokhzani, who is chairman of the F1 circuit in Malaysia. 'In 2001, someone approached me to take up the Porsche franchise and I thought, 'why not, it's a good brand'.'

How many cars does he sell? 'We sell around 130 a year which is nothing compared to the 300 or so that are sold annually in Singapore,' he says. 'It's just amazing, the number they sell there.'

He has bowed out of active politics. 'I used to be treasurer of Umno Youth but now I no longer have any political ambitions,' says Mr Mokhzani. 'My father used to say 'choose one or the other, business or politics'. So I choose business.'

Still, he thought at one time that his business benefited his politicking. 'At the beginning, it helped,' he recalls.

'My hospital group came in very handy because I could send doctors to the villages to give free treatment and medicine ... My manufacturing division gave people jobs. Once I left all of that, I lost the ability to do that.' Mr Mokhzani's younger brother Mukhriz, however, is still in active politics and is an elected member of the executive committee of Umno's youth wing.

Mr Mokhzani downplays his property ventures. 'We have invested in a small way,' he says. 'It's just that we occasionally take up 5 to 10 per cent in other development projects through a private company.'

But he waxes enthusiastic about oil and gas. 'Global oil prices are high and so there is a lot of new investment,' he says. 'The oil people are hungry for concessions. I think it will remain bullish and it will last for quite a while.

'When companies sign a production sharing contract in Malaysia, it is usually for around 25 years. The first five, to explore and find, then you develop for the next 20 years. Once you sign, you have to work, that's the way it is. And Malaysia has signed quite a few PSCs (production sharing contracts) so for us, the support services, there is plenty of work. For the next three to five years, it will be bullish.'

But he wants to take it slowly and to lead through alliances. 'We are the new boys on the block and our shareholders' funds are still small,' he says. 'I don't want to stretch our resources. It's better for us to team up with known players rather than going it alone.'

One recent venture was an alliance between the Singapore-based unit of Thailand's Mermaid Maritime to form a drilling services company. Separately, another joint venture between the two awarded Kencana a US$136 million contract to design, construct, equip and deliver a new-build tender rig.

Mr Mokhzani is enthusiastic about the alliance. 'It has done three things for us,' he says. 'We signed a contract to create our own drilling service where we have a 60 per cent interest. Two, we formed a company to own a vessel where we have 25 per cent. And, three, we won a contract to build a vessel for them at US$135 million. Building such a vessel has not been done in Malaysia, so we will be the first.'

He is bullish about the company's potential. 'We are going to grow 10-15 per cent a year, easy,' says Mr Mokhzani confidently. 'We think Mermaid will give us another order in six months, this time for a US$200 million vessel. Our order book right now stands at RM1.8 billion. When we listed, it was around RM800 million. So we are delivering.'

'We have expanded our yards significantly but still we have our hands full at the moment,' he continues. 'The Mermaid deal is a very big undertaking for us and we are bringing in technical experts. It will jump-start the business for us.'

On a separate note, the businessman, who is an F1 buff and chairman of the Sepang International Circuit, does not see a problem with Singapore's entry into motor-sport. 'Every year there are, what, 17 to 18 races throughout the world?' he says. 'When the season starts, we are the second race and they will be, maybe, the 13th. And the races are getting better in the sense that this year - with the Hamilton/Alonso thing - was really exciting.'

'I know Ong Beng Seng (the hotelier who helped bring F1 to Singapore) very well,' confides Mr Mokhzani. 'We had begun to talk about this two years ago and we have helped them. They've come here and we have shown them the workings of the track. To my mind, we are not really competing. Next year may be their first but it will be our 10th.'

He thinks it's been a great boon to the country. 'We have aggressively marketed it and by doing so we have promoted the country,' he says. 'Consumers are spoilt for choice - they have the English Premier League, they have rugby, all sorts of things. So we have had to hard-sell it to bring in the tourists, RM6-RM7 million a year in promotion. I believe Singapore is also looking at it from that point of view.'


Painful lessons from Asian crisis

MOKHZANI Mahathir surprised everyone when in April 2001 he declared that he was giving up his business interests in a bid to protect the family name in response to people who had accused his father's administration of nepotism. Mr Mokhzani's father is Malaysia's fourth prime minister Mahathir Mohamad, now 82, who stepped down on Oct 31, 2003.

Mr Mokhzani informed the stock exchange that he was selling his interests in two listed concerns - Pantai Holdings and Tongkah Holdings - which were then involved in healthcare, manufacturing, financial services and property development. He sold at a time of depressed stock market prices and couldn't have made much out of those transactions.

It was clear from his tone during that period that he was tired of repeated attacks from his father's political opponents that his corporate climb had been due to family ties. 'I am fed up with all these allegations,' he told a newspaper then. 'In this political climate, everything these companies do is construed as favouritism, and it's unfair to other shareholders.'

The onset of the Asian financial crisis deepened tensions between Dr Mahathir and his deputy Anwar Ibrahim, who was sacked in September, 1998, accused of 'moral misconduct'. Political temperatures soared and, in the process, the scrutiny over the business interests of Dr Mahathir's children intensified, hurting the premier's prestige.

Now Mr Mokhzani is back and enjoying favourable investor attention again through his company Kencana Petroleum which he took public late last year. But he's not about to forget those dark days. 'In 1999, the political temperature was quite hot,' says the businessman. 'And there was the economic crisis. And so for me, it was one step forward and several steps back.'

Is there anything he will carry over from the Asian crisis? Mr Mokhzani does not hesitate: 'With 20:20 hindsight, I guess I was far too diversified, I spread myself too thin and geared up too highly.'

The moral for the businessman is simple. 'Don't borrow too much,' he says. 'I geared up personally so I should know. You know, Pantai Holdings was a gem of a company, it had cash and it had a good, viable business with concessions. But we had to sell, you have to be able to survive so you step away and wait to come back another day.'

At the height of the crisis, Mr Mokhzani was reported to have racked up debts of close to RM200 million. He sold his interest in hospital specialist Pantai Holdings to Malaysian businessman Lim Tong Yong who controversially sold it to Singapore's Parkway Holdings last year. That caused a brouhaha as Pantai had two lucrative government concessions. In the end, state investment agency Khazanah Nasional stepped in and took up a majority interest in Pantai.

'I didn't have much of a surplus after I sold everything, not at all, just sort of enough to keep the bankers off my back,' continues Mr Mokhzani. 'But I did the right thing. Someone once told me never to be emotional about my companies. There should be no sentiment in business.'

He does not state the extent of his debt. 'Frankly, I'd rather not remember,' he says, wincing. 'It pushed me to take drastic action. We were getting letters from the banks with some threatening to take legal action against me. Not all though, one or two stood by us. Now, the bankers who stood by me are happier today than they were five years ago.'

Robert Kuok, the Real Sugar Daddy

If there really is a real sugar daddy, it’s Robert Kuok. Not because he is a Casanova or some sort, but simply because the sugar business made him a celebrity businessman.

Apart from being a king of sugar, Kuok also involves in a number of other businesses including freight & transportation, hospitality, manufacturing, distribution, oil and mining, finance, properties and publishing.

Forbes estimated Kuok to worth around $9 billion in 2008, which makes him the richest man in Malaysia as well as in South East Asia.

Just like Boon Siew and Lim Goh Tong who migrated from China main land to the then Malaya, Robert Kuok’s family too, were migrant. The difference is, it was his father who migrated from China. Kuok, the youngest of 3 brothers, was born in 1923 in Johor Bahru.

And unlike the late Boon Siew and Goh Tong, Kuok is one educated wealthy man. He received his early education in an English school and later enrolled into the Raffles College in Singapore, with Lee Kuan Yee as one of his school mates. He had a short stint working with Japanese company Mitsubishi after his studies in Raffles was halted due to Japanese invasion, before helping his father with trading business.

After his father’s death, Kuok and his two brothers made a decision to continue the business legacy, starting with sugar distribution and a few other commodities. Their business skills were picked up from their father, who was an avid trader.

Kuok’s massive involvement in sugar industry allowed his company to become the government’s supplier and Kuok opened up sugar refinery plants to grow it further. At the peak of his business, he was controlling as much as 80% of the sugar market in Malaysia, and about 10% of the global export market.

Driven by the success of his sugar business, Kuok swiftly expanded his business into flour milling, shipping, logistics, oil and gas and hotels. His rise to success, fame and prominence is attributed to both his expertise in spotting opportunities and his strong network with the big, corporate and government people. Kuok controls the Shangri-La hotel chains and is the largest shareholder of Transmile Group Berhad, which was involved in accounting irregularity scandal in 2007, plunging down the share price.

He is said to be checking his hotels every now and then to make sure that the staff are giving the service of highest quality. At times he invited taxi drivers for free lunch at the hotel’s cafe. Kuok is considered a true gentleman when dealing with people, including his employees. There is a story of Kuok asking permission from a cabin crew to smoke a cigarette in a plane he owns. When the crew told him that he wouldn’t need to ask anyone’s permission, he responded by saying that he is just asking in a capacity of a normal passenger.

Kuok also owns a string of Coca Cola bottling plants in China, as well as modern warehouse and cargo distribution centers in Hong Kong. His other regional businesses and interest include in Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and Fiji. Robert Kuok is one of five advisers of the Iskandar Region Development Authority (IRDA), which is directly responsible to attract investment for the Iskandar Malaysia infrastructure project.

Ahad, 31 Januari 2010

Ada dua cara pantau pasaran saham

PELABUR dan penganalisis pasaran menggunakan pelbagai kaedah ramalan dan pemantauan harga dan pergerakan pasaran saham bagi membantu mereka dalam menentukan strategi pelaburan.

Dua kaedah utama yang biasanya digunakan adalah Analisis Fundamental (Asas) dan Analisis Teknikal. Ada perbezaan ketara antara kedua-dua analisis berkenaan.

Walaupun saya sebenarnya menyokong analisis teknikal, namun saya juga tidak menafikan kepentingan analisis fundamental.

Apakah perbezaan antara kedua-dua analisis ini? Analisis fundamental atau analisis teras adalah satu kaedah meramalkan arah pergerakan harga berdasarkan kedudukan ekonomi sesebuah negara seperti kadar keluaran negara kasar (KNK), kadar inflasi, kadar pengangguran, kadar pernawaran wang, politik dan faktor berkaitan.

Sesudah menganalisis keadaan makro ekonomi negara, fundamentalis juga meneliti dari sudut mikro dengan membuat analisis laporan tahunan syarikat seperti penyata kewangan, kunci kira-kira dan rekod pembayaran dividen.

Selain itu, mereka juga meneliti nisbah kewangan syarikat termasuk nisbah penggearan (gearing ratio), pulangan pelaburan, nisbah harga perolehan atau price earnings ratio (PER), pulangan sesaham atau earnings per share (EPS).

Mereka juga turut meneliti aktiviti semasa dan akan datang syarikat seperti arah aliran jualan, aliran pengeluaran, kapasiti pengeluaran kilang, kekuatan pengurusan dan pembahagian pasaran.

Dengan mengabungkan analisis makro dan mikro, mereka menentukan harga sebenar sesuatu saham itu atau lebih dikenali sebagai nilai intrinsik (intrinsic value).

Jika harga semasa sesuatu saham itu dijual dibawah nilai intrinsiknya, maka saham itu dikatakan sesuai untuk dibeli. Sebaliknya, jika harga semasa saham itu di atas nilai intrinsiknya, mereka akan menjual dan meninggalkan pasaran.

Perjuangan Islam di Malaysia: Antara realiti dan perjuangan

Oleh: rausyanfikir

“Kamu orang apa? PAS ke ABIM ke UMNO?”
“Saya orang Islam, dan saya menyokong kebenaran”
Mungkin senario ini jarang kita hadapai tetapi jauh dilubuk hati para da’ie pasti timbul gejolak pemikiran sebegini.

Begitulah realiti yang menggigit dunia perjuangan dan dakwah pada hari ini. Tidak sah jika identifikasi berkenaan dengan kumpulan yang didokong tidak dinyatakan dengan jelas oleh mana-mana pihak.

Di sebelah sini mengatakan kumpulan ini paling syumul, di sebelah sana pula mengatakan kumpulan ini play safe dan kedengaran juga suara-suara yang menyapa kumpulan sana hanya panda bercermah dan mencemuh.

Hairan bukan? Sudahlah umat Islam Negara ini terpecah kepada dua golongan besar yang menyokong agenda Nasionalis dan Islam tiba-tiba dalam kelompok pembawa api kebenaran terdapat juga serpihan debu yang mengotorkan tangan pembawa obor: perpecahan antara kumpulan-kumpulan Islam turut berlaku dalam kelompok besar yang memperjuangkan islam di tanah air.

Bukankah kita sudah sedia maklum bahawa di akhir zaman ini, Al Ahzab moden sudah bersedia berpadu tenaga tanpa mengira ideologi dan akidah melainkan sepakat membulatkan nafsu menentang Islam yang sejati. Kristian, Hindu, Zionis dan Atheis yang radikal tidak peduli sama ada mereka sebulu ataupun tidak, melainkan hati hitam yang bencikan islam.
Bagaimana kita di Malaysia? Saya boleh terima jika PAS dan UMNO bermusuh akibat perbezaan dasar perjuangan tetapi krisis inter-kumpulan Islam? Adalah sesuatu yang sangat tidak wajar berlaku di saat-saat begini.

Bersatu teguh bercerai roboh

Rasanya peribahasa di atas sudah cukup menggambarkan betapa perpaduan bagi umat melayu Islam sangat penting bagi menjamin kedaulatan bangsa, agama dan Negara kita. Malanganya, ada sesetengah mungkin juga sesetengah yang banyak kuantitinya gagal menghayati maksud perpaduan tersebut.

“Kumpulan aku lebih baik! Kami tidak gentar menyatakan aqidah perjuangan kami!’
“ Kumpulan kami pula lebih banyak lakukan perubahan pada golongan professional!”

Realiti semasa perjuangan Islam di Malaysia ini sememangnya mengambarkan beberapa sudut. Di satu penjuru terdapat Muslimin dan Muslimat yang berjuang dengan penat lelah dalam menentang kezaliman penguasa manakala dalam satu sudut yang lain terdapat juga mereka yang mampu menarik keluar ahli maksiat kepada ahli masyarakat yang lebih berguna.

Semua orang mempunyai tempat yang tersendiri dalam perjuangan. Perjuangan tidak pernah dieksklusifkan hanya milik kumpulan Islam tertentu malah Allah juga tidak meletakkan hanya Islam sahaja yang layak berjuang dalam menentang segala kezaliman dan kemusnahan.
Lihat saja dunia yang penuh warna warni dari zaman Gandhi ke Guevara dan dari Mandela ke Malcolm X yang mana masing-masing mempunyai susur galur berduri yang tersendiri. Ada yang berjaya ada yang masih belum merasai buah kemenangan.

Walau apa pun perjuangan tersebut dimulakan, ia mula atas perasaan dan fitrah semulajadi manusia yang cintakan kedamaian dan keadilan, membencikan kekacauan dan kezaliman.
Tetapi, walaubagaimanapun, perjuangan menuntut KEBENARAN sudah tentu hanyak milik kepada Islam kerana akar ataupun akidah perjuangan mestilah tepat bagi menyempurnakan fitrah hidup yang sudah dicipta khas untuk manusia yang tunduk kepada Khaliqnya.

Sayangnya, walaupun kita sudah berada pada jalan perjuangan yang BENAR berbanding beribu-ribu manusia yang berjuang tetapi masih gagal menemui al-haq, kita masih gagal menyatukan sumber dan kekuatan perjuangan Islam tersebut.

Sifat taasub inilah yang menghindarkan kita dari menyelesaikan masalah yang sebenar iaitu masalah ummah. Pernah berlaku bila mana seorang ahli gerakan mengemukakan konsep yang lebih mengfokus kepada ummah ataupun dalam bahasa modennya Ummah centric dalam tulisannya tiba-tiba sahaja sesetengah daripada kita melenting dan terus mencaci dengan begitu dahsyat kepada saudara perjuangan kita hanya kerana kita tidak mampu memahami dengan lebih mendalam konsep “Ummah Centric” yang cuba di sampaikan tersebut.Tidak kisahlah untuk kita tidak dapat menerima pandangan insan tersebut tetapi dimanakah adab sesama kita dalam tidak mempesetujui perkara sebegitu?

Minda tertutup kerana bersikap idealistik

Baru-baru ini saya menghadiri perhimpunan nasional gerakan-gerakan Islam di Malaysia yang dianjurkan oleh Sekretariat Kongres Umat Islam Se-Malaysia dan Kerajaan Negeri Kelantan untuk membincangkan gerak kerja menggemblengkan potensi umat untuk tahun-tahun yang berikutnya. Sambutan yang ditunjukkan sangat menggalakkan kerana hampir kesemua gerakan hadir kecuali UMNO (mungkin kerana faktor kerajaan Negeri Kelantan sebagai salah satu pihak penganjur).

Terdapat satu sesi yang sangat menarik bila mana perbincangan bersama tokoh ilmuan perlembagaan Malaysia iaitu Prof. Aziz Bari yang berlegar mengenai isu “ Adakah Malaysia sebuah negara Islam?”

Saya kira, beliau sememangnya mahu mencetuskan anjakan paradigma untuk melihat sejauh mana para pejuang Islam di tanah air ini memberi respons dalam isu ini. Katanya:
“ Malaysia ini bukanlah sebuah negara Islam mahupun negara sekular kerana kita tidak memenuhi kesemua kriteria untuk kedua-dua ciri tersebut dalam struktur perlembagaan dan undang-undang negara kita”

Bayangkan reaksi yang ditimbulkan oleh para delegasi seolah-olah hendak bertegang urat dengan beliau. Masih ramai yang mahu menegaskan negara ini merupakan negara Islam dan bukan sekular ( mungkin mereka bermaksud negara Muslim kerana majoriti penduduk Malaysia adalah Melayu Muslim ataupun melihat kembali status quo sejarah tanah air ini pernah didaulatkan dengan Islam) dan pelbagai hujah dan kekeliruan yang timbul dalam membahas isu ini.

Keadaan menjadi agak hangat sehinggakan pihak pengajur terpaksa bertindak dengan pantas bagi mengendurkan suasana tersebut menjadi lebih rasional daripada emosional.
Mungkin tidak ramai yang bersetuju dengan kenyataan beliau tetapi bagi saya, Prof Aziz Bari bersikap pragmatik dalam hal Negara Islam. Untuk kita menyatakan kepada dunia bahawa Malaysia merupakan Negara Islam melalui peti undi merupakan satu perkara yang agak mustahil.

Prof Aziz Bari sendiri melontarkan kembali soalan kepada para delegasi bahawa benchmark ataupun kayu ukur mana yang perlu kita guna dalam menilai sejauh manakah ‘Islam-nya’ negara kita ini kelak apabila Islam kembali berkuasa? Sudah tentu model yang terbaik ialah Madinah Al-Munawarah sewaktu baginda Rasulullah S.A.W memerintah.

Realitinya Malaysia adalah sebuah negara yang majmuk. Kita mempunyai pelbagai kaum dan agama yang dimana hampir kesemua daripada mereka yang bukan Islam masih tidak faham Islam sebagai ad-deen walaupun kita sudah 50 tahun hidup secara aman. Belum lagi kita kira golongan Melayu yang langsung melihat Islam sebagai agama ritual semata-mata. Masih jauh lagi untuk kita capai matlamat terulung tersebut dan seperti kata Presiden CAP iaitu S.M Idris:
“ For you to create an Islamic State you must create an Islamic Society first”

Kenyataan S.M Idris ini boleh saya simpulkan sebagai mekanisme sulbah yang mana kita bermula dengan individu Muslim, Keluarga Muslim, Masyarakat Muslim, Negara Islam sehinggalah kepada Khilafah yang telah lama hilang dari ingatan kaum Muslimin di dunia ini.
Saya kira kita harus bersikap realistik seperti Turki dalam melalui jalan sulbah ini. Fokuskan kepada masalah umat yang bersifat dasar daripada bertelagah mengenai perkara yang lebih ideal sifatnya untuk masa sekarang.

Saya tidak berkata tidak perlu para da’ie berpeluk tubuh dalam menghadapi suasana politik yang korup tetapi jangalah sampai kita terbawa-bawa dengan tarikan kuasa untuk menegakkan syariah melalui peti undi tanpa melakukan Islah dari bawah iaitu terhadap umat dahulu.
Kesemua ini perlu berjalan seiringan dimana ada kumpulan yang berjuang meng’Islam’kan politik dan ada kumpulan yang gigih meng’Islah’kan masyarakat dari akar umbi. Maka sikap “jemaah aku paling hebat” sudah tentu tidak akan timbul dan apatah lagi berbalah sesama kita.

Islam ini syumul
Islam sepertimana yang kita tahu bukan sekadar agama ritual. Kita berTuhan kerana kita percaya dengan fitrah manusia sebagai makhluk yang lemah yang senantiasa bergantung kepada Allah dalam melaksanakan tanggungjawab kita sebagai khalifah di muka bumi Allah ini (hablumminallah).

Kita juga sedar bahawa sebagai manusia kita tidak hidup berseorangan di muka bumi ini. Kita perlu menjalinkan hubungan selaku indvidiu, anggota masyarakat, anggota keluarga dan pelbagai lagi peranan sebagai manusia dalam kelompok yang besar (hamblumminannas).

Sudah tentu kesemua ini perlukan aturan yang lengkap dan kemas. Maka disinilah peranan Islam sebagai cara hidup yang melampaui erti agama yang difahami kebanyakkan manusia di atas muka bumi Allah ini.Saya mewakafkan diri kepada perjuangan Islam bukan kerana ingin menegakkan Islam melalui peti undi tetapi kerana saya sangat mempercayai Islam itu sungguh lengkap dan tidak mampu ditandingi oleh mana-mana kuasa dan idea apatah lagi Islam itu sendiri melengkapi kepada semua perkara dan tidak ada sedikit pun cacat cela akan ad-deen ini.

Atas dasar kefahaman inilah saya sanggup meninggalkan keenakan hidup duniawi untuk mencari redha Allah demi melihat Islam kembali menyinari alam tidak kira sinaran kebenaran itu kepada umat Islam yang telah tenggelam ataupun umat manusia sekalian yang masih meraba-raba dalam kesesatan.

Perasaan untuk menerima Islam sebagai ad-deen dalam diri saya ini melampaui sempadan kebersamaan saya dengan kumpulan Islam tertentu malah lebih daripada identiti saya sebagai Melayu Muslim.Islam sebagai ad-deen telah menusuk jiwa manusiawi saya yang lemah sehinggakan roh Islam itu menggantikan roh manusiawi yang tidak ada makna jikalu tidak mengenali Tuhan yang Esa melalui cara yang telah digariskan oleh-Nya iaitu Islam sebagai ad-deen.

Jikalau betul para pejuang Islam di Malaysia ini percaya Islam itu syumul kenapa masih terdapat lompongan yang besar dalam pelbagai aspek perjuangan antaranya seperti dalam bidang alam sekitar, perdaganan dan lain-lain bidang yang dimana kita menerima model dan pendekatan Barat untuk kita gunakan dalam pembangunan masyarakat kita.

Pernah Tuan Haji Azmi (Presiden TERAS) dan S.M Idris (Presiden CAP) pergi ke Pakistan untuk bertemu dengan beberapa tokoh gerakan di Paksitan dan diantaranya ialah Presiden Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) yang dahulunya terkenal dengan susuk seperti As-Syaheed Abul A’la Al-Mawdudi yang hidup sezaman dengan As-Syaheed Imam Hassan Al Bana.

Ketika mana Tuan Haji Azmi dan S.M Idris bertemu dengan Presiden JI pada masa kini iaitu Qazi Hussain Ahmad, mereka bertanyakan kenapa JI tidak memperjuangkan isu-isu alam sekitar dan kepenggunaan? Jawapan yang diberi cukup menduka citakan. Qazi Hussain bertanya kembali kepada mereka bahawasanya bukankah itu merupakan isu orang Kristian?
Kenyataan sebeginilah yang mendukacitakan mereka berdua termasuklah saya selaku orang yang memandang tinggi gerakan Islam tersebut.

Ternyata gerakan Islam sendiri yang bersikap sempit minda dalam melihat masalah umat. Ia berlaku hampir di semua tempat di dunia ini dan gerakan Islam gagal menggunakan potensi yang ada untuk membawa isu-isu sebegini.

Realiti yang cukup takut untuk kita fikirkan. Lompong-lompong yang ada ini siapakah yang bertanggungjawab terhadapnya? Kita ada pelbagai jenis kumpulan Islam di Malaysia dan kita masih gagal untuk menutupi permasalahan yang timbul semakin hari semakin kompleks. Akhirnya, disebabkan kita tidak ada peneraju dalam bidang tertentu kita gagal memahami keperluan yang kritikal dalam menangani isu tersebut.

Jikalau kita lihat senario di atas, perlukah kita bercakar ayam dalam menyelesaikan masalah umat? Mungkin cakarnya tidak jelas tetapi sakit daripada perbuatan itu akhirnya melukai roh perjuangan untuk menyelamatakn umat dan ini akhirnya membuatkan gerakan Islam lebih terdedah kepada ancaman Ahzab Moden yang lebih kompleks lagi licik.

Cukuplah dengan jemaah centric yang berlebihan yang melahirkan ketaasuban terhadap kumpulan yang disertai sehinggakan kumpulan lain seolah-olah tidak ada tempat dan tidak betul manhajnya.

Cukuplah juga dengan ummah centric yang melampau yang akhirnya menjadikan diri terumbang ambing ditelan ombak ganas akibat menaiki sampan sendiri sehingga menidakkan keperluan bersama kapal yang lebih besar dan selamat dalam menongkah ombak ganas tersebut.

Kesemua ini hanya akan mendatangkan kelemahan kepada perjuangan umat Islam di tanah air. Seperti kata Ustaz Hasrizal jemaah itu keperluan dan ummah itu tujuan. Insyaallah jikalau kita mengambil sikap bersederhana dalam hal ini, umat Islam di Malaysida tidak akan rugi malah kita dapat menzahirkan betapa Islam ini mampu menyelesaikan segala permasalahan manusia.